🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a good starting point," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for young users," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is mostly occurring at the regional level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this international debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers show that governments globally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.